diff --git a/GPU/Common/SplineCommon.cpp b/GPU/Common/SplineCommon.cpp
index fc56f65ae9..a4d7cbf683 100644
--- a/GPU/Common/SplineCommon.cpp
+++ b/GPU/Common/SplineCommon.cpp
@@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ void  _SplinePatchFullQuality(u8 *&dest, int &count, const SplinePatchLocal &spa
 
 	// Increase tesselation based on the size. Should be approximately right?
 	// JPCSP is wrong at least because their method results in square loco roco.
-	int patch_div_s = (spatch.count_u - 3) * gstate.getPatchDivisionU() / 3;
-	int patch_div_t = (spatch.count_v - 3) * gstate.getPatchDivisionV() / 3;
+	int patch_div_s = (spatch.count_u - 3) * gstate.getPatchDivisionU();
+	int patch_div_t = (spatch.count_v - 3) * gstate.getPatchDivisionV();
 
 	if (patch_div_s <= 0) patch_div_s = 1;
 	if (patch_div_t <= 0) patch_div_t = 1;
diff --git a/GPU/GLES/Spline.cpp b/GPU/GLES/Spline.cpp
index 8707c8a1be..1f5df30ad2 100644
--- a/GPU/GLES/Spline.cpp
+++ b/GPU/GLES/Spline.cpp
@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ void TransformDrawEngine::SubmitBezier(void* control_points, void* indices, int
 	// like the splines, so we subdivide across the whole "mega-patch".
 	if (num_patches_u == 0) num_patches_u = 1;
 	if (num_patches_v == 0) num_patches_v = 1;
-	int tess_u = gstate.getPatchDivisionU() / num_patches_u;
-	int tess_v = gstate.getPatchDivisionV() / num_patches_v;
+	int tess_u = gstate.getPatchDivisionU();
+	int tess_v = gstate.getPatchDivisionV();
 	if (tess_u < 4) tess_u = 4;
 	if (tess_v < 4) tess_v = 4;