From 5318e97a2ea9a63c6593c0fbb0087a7db9c55bfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Unknown W. Brackets" <checkins@unknownbrackets.org>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 11:28:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Threads starting better threads should stay at top.

This wasn't correct, I think I must've added it because something else
should've been rescheduling.
---
 Core/HLE/sceKernelThread.cpp | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Core/HLE/sceKernelThread.cpp b/Core/HLE/sceKernelThread.cpp
index 11aba9b286..e4f677cbc4 100644
--- a/Core/HLE/sceKernelThread.cpp
+++ b/Core/HLE/sceKernelThread.cpp
@@ -1862,8 +1862,6 @@ int sceKernelStartThread(SceUID threadToStartID, int argSize, u32 argBlockPtr)
 		// TODO: Maybe this happens even for worse-priority started threads?
 		dispatchEnabled = true;
 
-		if (cur && cur->isRunning())
-			cur->nt.status &= ~THREADSTATUS_RUNNING;
 		__KernelChangeReadyState(cur, currentThread, true);
 		hleReSchedule("thread started");
 	}